Bruce Robert Laxalt
DeceasedBar #976 - ATTORNEY Deceased
- Admitted
- 9/20/1976
- Law school
- Stanford University
In Memoriam
Bruce Robert Laxalt - 1951-03-26 to 2010-03-19
Bruce Robert Laxalt was a Reno native and the grandson of Basque immigrants, part of a four-generation Nevada family. After graduating from Reno High School in 1969, he earned an undergraduate degree in philosophy at Stanford University and went on to graduate from Stanford Law School in 1976. He began his legal career as a lawyer at the Department of Justice in Washington, D.C., before returning to Nevada to clerk for Nevada Supreme Court Justice Gordon Thompson.
Bruce then joined the Washoe County District Attorney's Office, where he eventually became Chief Criminal Deputy under District Attorney Cal Dunlap. He moved to the private sector in 1982, and in 1985, together with his partner Don Nomura, established the statewide law firm of Laxalt and Nomura. Over the course of his career he developed a national reputation as a civil litigator, earning recognition in Best Lawyers in America and Chambers Leading Business Lawyers, and becoming a member of the American Board of Trial Attorneys.
Bruce was diagnosed with ALS in 2001, yet he continued to practice law for many years despite his growing physical challenges. During this time he returned to his early love of writing, publishing a book of poems, Songs of Mourning and Worship, which was partially translated and published in Basque and featured in several anthologies and law journals. He had completed the first draft of a second book, Tenets of Survival, at the time of his passing. Beyond the law, he was an accomplished and enthusiastic soaring pilot who competed in numerous regional and national competitions.
Bruce Laxalt Obituary (2010) - Reno, NV (The Reno Gazette Journal and Lyon County News Leader (via Legacy.com))
Discipline history
No discipline on record.
Record last verified May 25, 2026
Appellate record
Handled 4 Supreme Court of Nevada / U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit cases on record.
Results in appellate decisions and orders
Details by role (challenging vs. defending a ruling)
- Civil cases - Challenging a ruling: won 0 of 1 (1 mixed)
- Civil cases - Defending a ruling: won 1 of 1
Appellate courts uphold far more rulings than they overturn, so lawyers who mostly defend rulings tend to show higher won-shares than lawyers who mostly challenge them. This breakdown lets you compare like with like.
Won means the court ruled the way this side asked. Mixed means the court agreed in part. Cases that were dismissed or have no clear result are listed but not counted. Based on the court's published decisions and unpublished orders; coverage is still being extended.
- 44467 - ALLSTATE INS. CO. VS. THORPE (Nov 21, 2007)Partly overturnedMixed - challenged the ruling case details
- 45364 - NANOPIERCE TECHNOLOGIES VS. DEPOSITORY TRUST (Sep 20, 2007)Ruling upheldWon - defended the ruling case details
- 05-759909th Cir. - Copperfield v. USDC-NVL (Jan 26, 2006) case details
- 39605 - WEINER VS. BEATTY (Jun 9, 2005) case details
Case data via YourNevadaJudges.com - Nevada appellate decisions and orders; U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dockets via CourtListener (Free Law Project)
Profile data from official public records, last verified May 25, 2026. Request a correction via the corrections page.