Daniel M. Bunin
Deceased1 discipline recordBar #5239 - ATTORNEY Deceased
- Firm / organization
- The Law Office Of Daniel M. Bunin
- Admitted
- 10/3/1994
- Law school
- University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law
- Location
- Las Vegas, NV
In Memoriam
Daniel M. Bunin
Daniel M. Bunin was a longtime Las Vegas criminal defense attorney who had been licensed to practice law in Nevada since 1994. He grew up in Norfolk, Virginia, before moving to Las Vegas as a teenager, attended Valley High School, and completed his undergraduate studies at UNLV. He earned his law degree from the University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law in California.
Over a career devoted to criminal defense, Bunin earned a reputation as a formidable courtroom advocate. More than a decade before his death, he and fellow attorney Dayvid Figler raised concerns about how the Clark County district attorney's office had compensated witnesses, discovering that relevant records had reportedly been destroyed even though copies still existed. Prosecutors ultimately ended the practice - a lasting mark of his work on behalf of the accused.
Colleagues and family remembered his dedication to the profession he loved. His wife, Violet Radosta, herself a deputy public defender, described him as the most talented attorney she had ever seen in court and said he never wanted to do anything other than serve as a criminal defense attorney. He died in August 2021 at the age of 55.
Daniel Bunin dies; Las Vegas lawyer's body recovered in Maui (Las Vegas Review-Journal)
Discipline history
Type: Order Approving Conditional Guilty Plea Agreement Effective Date: 07/22/13 Case Number: 60372 [ View Document ]
View document (PDF)
Record last verified Jul 3, 2026
Appellate record
Handled 7 Supreme Court of Nevada / Court of Appeals of Nevada cases on record.
Results in appellate decisions and orders
- Criminal cases
- 25% of 4
- Court-order requests
- 0% of 1
Details by role (challenging vs. defending a ruling)
- Criminal cases - Challenging a ruling: won 0 of 3
- Criminal cases - Defending a ruling: won 1 of 1
- Court-order requests - Requesting a court order: won 0 of 1
Appellate courts uphold far more rulings than they overturn, so lawyers who mostly defend rulings tend to show higher won-shares than lawyers who mostly challenge them. This breakdown lets you compare like with like.
Won means the court ruled the way this side asked. Mixed means the court agreed in part. Cases that were dismissed or have no clear result are listed but not counted. Based on the court's published decisions and unpublished orders; coverage is still being extended.
- 81577-COA - BROWN (LAMAR) VS. STATE (Sep 13, 2021)Ruling upheldLost - challenged the ruling case details
- 78994 - FOX (DEREK) VS. STATE (Apr 20, 2021)Ruling upheldLost - challenged the ruling case details
- 77486 - ROSS (EUGENE) VS. DIST. CT. (STATE) (Jan 17, 2019)Request deniedLost - sought the court order case details
- 75637 - SEWELL (MILYONE) VS. STATE (Jul 2, 2018)Dismissednot counted case details
- 73450 - STATE VS. LORING (GIOVANNI) (Mar 15, 2018)Ruling upheldWon - defended the ruling case details
- 71906 - NEWMAN (JERIEL) VS. STATE (Sep 15, 2017)Dismissednot counted case details
- 66934-COA - DONALDSON (MARK) VS. STATE (Jan 22, 2016)Ruling upheldLost - challenged the ruling case details
Case data via YourNevadaJudges.com - Nevada appellate decisions and orders
Profile data from official public records, last verified Jul 3, 2026. Request a correction via the corrections page.