Don P. Chairez
Deceased1 discipline recordBar #3495 - ATTORNEY Deceased
- Admitted
- 9/26/1988
- Law school
- USC
- Location
- Pahrump, NV
In Memoriam
Don P. Chairez - September 29, 1955 to January 21, 2021
Don P. Chairez was a Nevada attorney and former Clark County District Judge whose legal career spanned four decades. Born September 29, 1955, in Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, he earned his Juris Doctor from the USC School of Law in 1980. In 1990 he joined the Clark County District Attorney's Office as a deputy district attorney, spending roughly three and a half years prosecuting criminal cases.
In 1994, Chairez was appointed to the Eighth Judicial District Court by Governor Bob Miller. On the bench he became known for decisions protecting small property owners - among them Carol Pappas and the Aztec Casino - against eminent domain actions by the City of Las Vegas Redevelopment Agency. In 1996 he was honored by the Nevada Conference of Police and Sheriffs as 'Judge of the Year.' In 1998 he resigned his judgeship to make an unsuccessful run for the U.S. House of Representatives against Shelley Berkley, losing by roughly 5,000 votes.
Following his congressional campaign, Chairez returned to private practice, winning several cases before the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. In 2019 he returned to public service as a prosecutor, serving as a Deputy District Attorney for Nye County under District Attorney Chris Arabia. He died January 21, 2021, in Las Vegas from COVID-19 at the age of 65.
DON CHAIREZ Obituary (1955 - 2021) - Las Vegas, NV (Las Vegas Review-Journal / Legacy.com) - Don Chairez, former Clark County judge, dies of COVID (Las Vegas Review-Journal) - Nye County Deputy DA Don Chairez dies of COVID-19 (Las Vegas Sun)
Discipline history
Public Reprimand Case No.: OBC19-0611 Effective Date: 10/05/2020 [ View Document ]
View document (PDF)
Record last verified Jun 17, 2026
Appellate record
Handled 4 Court of Appeals of Nevada cases on record.
Results in appellate decisions and orders
Details by role (challenging vs. defending a ruling)
- Criminal cases - Defending a ruling: won 1 of 4 (3 mixed)
Appellate courts uphold far more rulings than they overturn, so lawyers who mostly defend rulings tend to show higher won-shares than lawyers who mostly challenge them. This breakdown lets you compare like with like.
Won means the court ruled the way this side asked. Mixed means the court agreed in part. Cases that were dismissed or have no clear result are listed but not counted. Based on the court's published decisions and unpublished orders; coverage is still being extended.
- 80418-COA - BRAITHWAITE (LAKSMI) VS. STATE C/W 80419 (Jan 8, 2021)Partly overturnedMixed - defended the ruling case details
- 80420-COA - BRAITHWAITE (LAKSMI) VS. STATE (Jan 8, 2021)Partly overturnedMixed - defended the ruling case details
- 80421-COA - BRAITHWAITE (LAKSMI) VS. STATE (Jan 8, 2021)Partly overturnedMixed - defended the ruling case details
- 80734-COA - ALTHEIDE (JASON) VS. STATE (Dec 8, 2020)Ruling upheldWon - defended the ruling case details
Case data via YourNevadaJudges.com - Nevada appellate decisions and orders
Profile data from official public records, last verified Jun 17, 2026. Request a correction via the corrections page.