John Peter Lee
DeceasedBar #1768 - ATTORNEY Deceased
- Admitted
- 10/28/1955
- Law school
- U. of San Francisco
In Memoriam
John Peter Lee - 1926-08-06 to 2015-07-09
John Peter Lee was a legal pioneer and iconic trial lawyer whose career in Nevada spanned six decades. Born on August 6, 1926, in San Francisco, he was a 1949 graduate of the University of Nevada, Reno, and earned his law degree from the University of San Francisco School of Law in 1953. He moved his family to Las Vegas in 1954, opening a law practice in a small office on Fremont Street and beginning a long and illustrious legal career working alongside prominent attorney G. William Coulthard, who later became his brother-in-law.
Over the course of his career, John became the second longest continuously practicing litigator in Nevada. Specializing in complex litigation, he handled thousands of cases, ranging from the MGM Fire lawsuit to airspace eminent domain matters - one of which resulted in nearly the largest inverse condemnation settlement in Nevada history. He was associated with at least one hundred cases before the Nevada Supreme Court.
John served as chairman of the Clark County Legal Aid & Defenders' Society and was a member of the Nevada State Board of Bar Examiners, the Board of Governors of the Nevada State Bar, and Master of the Bench of the American Inns of Court. A strong advocate for those less fortunate than himself, he mentored many young legal practitioners over his sixty-plus year career, some of whom went on to become judges on the state and federal benches as well as prominent attorneys in their own right. The legacy he left behind in the legal community of Nevada will be felt for generations to come.
John Peter Lee (Nevada Appeal) - John Lee Obituary (Las Vegas Review-Journal)
Discipline history
No discipline on record.
Record last verified Jun 18, 2026
Appellate record
Handled 2 Supreme Court of Nevada cases on record.
Results in appellate decisions and orders
- Civil cases
- 100% of 1
- Court-order requests
- 0% of 1
Details by role (challenging vs. defending a ruling)
- Civil cases - Challenging a ruling: won 1 of 1
- Court-order requests - Opposing a court-order request: won 0 of 1
Appellate courts uphold far more rulings than they overturn, so lawyers who mostly defend rulings tend to show higher won-shares than lawyers who mostly challenge them. This breakdown lets you compare like with like.
Won means the court ruled the way this side asked. Mixed means the court agreed in part. Cases that were dismissed or have no clear result are listed but not counted. Based on the court's published decisions and unpublished orders; coverage is still being extended.
- 43501 - MARQUIS & AURBACH VS. DIST. CT. (Nov 30, 2006)Request grantedLost - opposed the court order case details
- 37706 - NEVADA CONTRACT SERVICES VS. SQUIRREL COMPANIES (May 14, 2003)Ruling overturnedWon - challenged the ruling case details
Case data via YourNevadaJudges.com - Nevada appellate decisions and orders
Profile data from official public records, last verified Jun 18, 2026. Request a correction via the corrections page.