Neil Gilbert Galatz
DeceasedBar #3 - ATTORNEY Deceased
- Admitted
- 11/5/1958
- Law school
- Columbia University
In Memoriam
Neil Gilbert Galatz - 1933-01-22 to 2013-01-03
Neil Gilbert Galatz was one of Nevada's most accomplished trial attorneys, a nationally recognized personal injury lawyer whose career in Las Vegas spanned more than five decades. Born in New York City on January 22, 1933, he earned a Bachelor of Arts from Adelphi College in New York in 1953 and a Juris Doctor from Columbia University in 1956. He came to Las Vegas in 1957 and began his legal career in public service, being appointed one of the county's deputy district attorneys in 1959.
In private practice, Galatz specialized in personal injury, medical and legal malpractice, and product liability, and he became known for successfully litigating some of the highest-profile cases in Nevada history. He served as co-chairman of the Plaintiff's Lead Counsel Committee in the multi-district litigation arising from the 1980 MGM Grand fire, which resulted in a $138 million settlement, and he played a leading role in the litigation following the 1981 Las Vegas Hilton fire. He also chaired the Plaintiff's Committee in the litigation stemming from the 1988 PEPCON explosion, which produced a $71 million settlement.
Galatz remained active in the law throughout his life, later serving as of counsel with the firm Gordon Silver and continuing to work in the days before his death. He died in Las Vegas on January 3, 2013, at the age of 79, remembered as a courtroom dynamo and a leader of the Nevada bar.
Top personal injury lawyer Galatz was courtroom dynamo (Las Vegas Review-Journal) - NEIL GALATZ Obituary (1933 - 2013) (Las Vegas Review-Journal / Legacy.com) - Neil Galatz Obituary - Las Vegas, NV (Dignity Memorial)
Discipline history
No discipline on record.
Record last verified Jul 15, 2026
Appellate record
Handled 4 Supreme Court of Nevada cases on record.
Results in appellate decisions and orders
- Civil cases
- 0% of 1
- Court-order requests
- 100% of 1
Details by role (challenging vs. defending a ruling)
- Civil cases - Defending a ruling: won 0 of 1
- Court-order requests - Requesting a court order: won 1 of 1
Appellate courts uphold far more rulings than they overturn, so lawyers who mostly defend rulings tend to show higher won-shares than lawyers who mostly challenge them. This breakdown lets you compare like with like.
Won means the court ruled the way this side asked. Mixed means the court agreed in part. Cases that were dismissed or have no clear result are listed but not counted. Based on the court's published decisions and unpublished orders; coverage is still being extended.
- 44347 - MARTINEZ VS. MARUSZCZAK (Oct 11, 2007)Ruling overturnedLost - defended the ruling case details
- 39336 - IN RE: DISCIPLINE OF DONALD MOSLEY (Dec 21, 2004) case details
- 40472 - CONTINENTAL INSURANCE VS. MURPHY (Sep 2, 2004) case details
- 36775 - MOSLEY VS. NEVADA COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE (May 17, 2001)Request grantedWon - sought the court order case details
Case data via YourNevadaJudges.com - Nevada appellate decisions and orders
Profile data from official public records, last verified Jul 15, 2026. Request a correction via the corrections page.