Smith Jain
Verified roster- Attorneys
- 3 active
- Experience
- 70 combined years - avg 23.3 per attorney (statewide average: 19.2)
- On the web
- smithjainstutzman.com
- Henderson
- 64 N. Pecos Rd., Suite 100
Henderson, NV 89074
(702) 583-6867
Record last verified Aug 25, 2026
Appellate record
Attorneys currently at this firm handled 40 Supreme Court of Nevada / Court of Appeals of Nevada cases on record, across 2 attorneys.
Results in appellate decisions and orders
- Civil cases
- 52% of 23
- Court-order requests
- 57% of 7
Details by role (challenging vs. defending a ruling)
- Civil cases - Challenging a ruling: won 2 of 4
- Civil cases - Defending a ruling: won 10 of 19 (5 mixed)
- Court-order requests - Requesting a court order: won 0 of 3
- Court-order requests - Opposing a court-order request: won 4 of 4
Appellate courts uphold far more rulings than they overturn, so lawyers who mostly defend rulings tend to show higher won-shares than lawyers who mostly challenge them. This breakdown lets you compare like with like.
Won means the court ruled the way this side asked. Mixed means the court agreed in part. Cases that were dismissed or have no clear result are listed but not counted. Based on the court's published decisions and unpublished orders; coverage is still being extended.
- 86548 - WALKER VS. WALKER (Jan 9, 2025)Ruling overturnedLost - defended the rulingCounsel: Radford Smith
- 86508-COA - MIZRACHI VS. MIZRACHI, JR. (CHILD CUSTODY) (Oct 22, 2024)Ruling upheldWon - defended the rulingCounsel: Radford Smith
- 87049 - TODD VS. TODD (May 13, 2024)Dismissednot countedCounsel: Radford Smith
- 87591 - ENGELSTAD VS. DIST. CT. (MCGARRY) (Feb 22, 2024)Request deniedLost - sought the court orderCounsel: Radford Smith
- 87620 - MCGARRY VS. DIST. CT. (MCGARRY) (Feb 22, 2024)Request deniedLost - sought the court orderCounsel: Radford Smith
- 87532 - ENGELSTAD VS. DIST. CT. (MCGARRY) (Nov 10, 2023)Request deniedWon - opposed the court orderCounsel: Radford Smith
- 86202 - KEHALY VS. DIST. CT. (KEHALY) (Oct 19, 2023)Request deniedWon - opposed the court orderCounsel: Garima Jain, Radford Smith
- 84427-COA - EIVAZI VS. EIVAZI (Oct 5, 2023)Partly overturnedMixed - defended the rulingCounsel: Garima Jain, Radford Smith
- 84086 - DAVITIAN-KOSTANIAN VS. KOSTANIAN (Aug 31, 2023)Ruling overturnedLost - defended the rulingCounsel: Radford Smith
- 82388-COA - HOSNY VS. HOSNY (Dec 22, 2022)Ruling overturnedLost - defended the rulingCounsel: Garima Jain, Radford Smith
Case data via YourNevadaJudges.com - Nevada appellate decisions and orders; counsel matched to the firm's current verified roster
Reviews & profiles elsewhere
Is this your firm?
Claim this firm to keep its profile, roster, and contact details current - free of charge.
Claim this firmAttorneys (2)
Also bar-listed at this firm (1)
Public licensing records list these attorneys at this firm, but they do not currently appear on the firm's own attorney pages. Bar records are self-reported and can lag.